** Humble Pi: A Comedy of Maths Errors ** PDF, ePub eBook Most of the time, the maths in our everyday lives works quietly behind the scenes. Until someone forgets to carry a '1' and a bridge collapses, a plane drops out of the sky or a building rocks when its resonant frequency matches a gym class leaping to Snap's 1990 hit I've Got The Power. This book is all about what happens when maths goes wrong in the real world.
Exploring a Most of the time, the maths in our everyday lives works quietly behind the scenes. Until someone forgets to carry a '1' and a bridge collapses, a plane drops out of the sky or a building rocks when its resonant frequency matches a gym class leaping to Snap's 1990 hit I've Got The Power. This book is all about what happens when maths goes wrong in the real world.
Exploring and explaining a litany of near-misses and mishaps involving the internet, big data, elections, street signs, lotteries and the Roman empire, Matt Parker shows us the bizarre ways maths trips us all up, and what this reveals about its essential place in our world. Mathematics doesn't have good 'people skills', but we would all be better off, he argues, if we saw it as a practical ally. By making maths our friend, we can use it to our advantage and learn from its pitfalls.

Hot
Best Seller

# Humble Pi: A Comedy of Maths Errors PDF, ePub eBook

**4.6**out of 5

#### Humble Pi: A Comedy of Maths Errors

Availability:
Ready to download

**File Name:** Humble Pi: A Comedy of Maths Errors .pdf

**How it works:**

`1.` Register a free 1 month Trial Account.

`2.` Download as many books as you like (Personal use)

`3.` Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.

Categories: Arts & Photography, Audiobooks, Biographies, Business & Money, Children's Books, Chinos, Comics, Computers, Cookbooks, Education, Limited Edition, Men's, Women's

## 30 review for Humble Pi: A Comedy of Maths Errors

Add a review

## Related products

**4**out of 5

### Plan to Fail (The Accidental Cases of Emily Abbott, #2)

Plan to Fail (The Accidental Cases of Emily Abbott, #2)

**5**out of 5

### Apple-achian Treasure (Auntie Clem's Bakery, #8)

Apple-achian Treasure (Auntie Clem's Bakery, #8)

**5**out of 5

### Red Rover, Red Rover (The Accidental Cases of Emily Abbott, #1)

Red Rover, Red Rover (The Accidental Cases of Emily Abbott, #1)

5out of 5Ed–Knew I was going to love this book when I opened it and immediately saw the page numbers going the wrong way. It is a lot of fun the whole way through. Parker takes us through some of his favourite, or some of the more noteworthy, cases of maths going wrong across a variety of applications. We're talking engineering and computing, from bridges to spacecraft to calendars to ancient sumerian tablets. His enthusiam shines brightly through, and it's hard to not be infected by it. His writing is infus Knew I was going to love this book when I opened it and immediately saw the page numbers going the wrong way. It is a lot of fun the whole way through. Parker takes us through some of his favourite, or some of the more noteworthy, cases of maths going wrong across a variety of applications. We're talking engineering and computing, from bridges to spacecraft to calendars to ancient sumerian tablets. His enthusiam shines brightly through, and it's hard to not be infected by it. His writing is infused with a dry wit and a good sprinkling of genuine laugh-out-loud humour, which hopefully would make this a fun read ever for those who aren't already invested in the maths stories. My major criticism is that despite the clear over-arching theme of maths problems, the book still does not feel that cohesive. It has the feeling of a series of articles, and just never quite manages to tie them all together or raise a greater point. This ultimately doesn't matter too much though as it is still a very engaging and enjoyable read. Definitely learnt a new thing or two!

5out of 5Mark Loughridge–I love maths. I enjoy finding out about mathematical and statistical errors. I was thinking some of my maths teacher friends might enjoy it and find it useful for illustrations in class. Thats where the plot breaks down a little. I enjoyed the book but was a little disappointed that so much was taken from fields of computing and engineering, where the issue wasn't strictly a mathematical failure, but a failure, for example, to understand the limits of binary, or load-bearing, or resonant frequenc I love maths. I enjoy finding out about mathematical and statistical errors. I was thinking some of my maths teacher friends might enjoy it and find it useful for illustrations in class. Thats where the plot breaks down a little. I enjoyed the book but was a little disappointed that so much was taken from fields of computing and engineering, where the issue wasn't strictly a mathematical failure, but a failure, for example, to understand the limits of binary, or load-bearing, or resonant frequency. Many of the examples could easily have found themselves in books subtitled "A Comedy of Engineering Errors" or "A Comedy of Programming Errors" The book is fine if you are looking for a book that shows how mathematics in its many practical applications goes wrong. Having said that there are chapters that are more maths/number/statistics oriented than others. But not as many as I would have liked. The book is reasonably well written, but a few too many asides to the reader for my liking.

5out of 5Brian Clegg–Matt Parker had me thoroughly enjoying this collection of situations where maths and numbers go wrong in everyday life. I think the book's title is a little weak - 'Humble Pi' doesn't really convey what it's about, but that subtitle 'a comedy of maths errors' is far more informative. With his delightful conversational style, honed in his stand-up maths shows, it feels as if Parker is a friend down the pub, relating the story of some technical disaster driven by maths and computing, or regaling us Matt Parker had me thoroughly enjoying this collection of situations where maths and numbers go wrong in everyday life. I think the book's title is a little weak - 'Humble Pi' doesn't really convey what it's about, but that subtitle 'a comedy of maths errors' is far more informative. With his delightful conversational style, honed in his stand-up maths shows, it feels as if Parker is a friend down the pub, relating the story of some technical disaster driven by maths and computing, or regaling us with a numerical cock-up. These range from the spectacular - wobbling and collapsing bridges, for example - to the small but beautifully formed, such as Excel's rounding errors. Sometimes it's Parker's little asides that are particularly attractive. I loved his rant on why phone numbers aren't numbers at all (would it be meaningful for someone to ask you what half your phone number is?). We discover the trials and tribulations of getting calendars right, explore some of the oddities of probability, enjoy a bit of impossible geometry and see how getting units right (or wrong) can make all the difference. Of course there are the big stories, from NASA disasters to the risks of trying to crash onboard systems on planes mid-flight. But it's often those little details like the phone numbers that tickled me. I loved, for example, Parker's attempts to get the footballs on UK signs geometrically correct - totally misunderstood by the bureaucracy - or when Parker points out the problems of graphics featuring multiple cogs interlocked with each other in a way that will lock them solid - not to mention his combinatorial struggles with the McDonald's McChoice menu. The only thing I did find - and this is the only reason the book doesn't get five stars - is that the final couple of chapters seemed a little samey. Rather than save the best to last, Parker resorts to revisiting rather familiar feeling computer problems, which are interesting (but perhaps more to me, with a background in computing, than many readers), but by now not quite as original and fresh feeling. However, this is an excellent read, managing to be light and meaty at the same time, and highly recommended for anyone interested in maths, business or computing.

4out of 5Tgv–Summary: not very interesting, and it's not about maths errors. This book is a collection of anecdotes that you can read anywhere: most of them I had read before, and you can find them on the internet, too. They're bundled by theme here, which is convenient, but the writer tries too hard to make them appear connected, and more often than not that results in uninspired paragraphs. Here's an example from a random page: "But what happens when computers try to divide by zero? Unless they've been expli Summary: not very interesting, and it's not about maths errors. This book is a collection of anecdotes that you can read anywhere: most of them I had read before, and you can find them on the internet, too. They're bundled by theme here, which is convenient, but the writer tries too hard to make them appear connected, and more often than not that results in uninspired paragraphs. Here's an example from a random page: "But what happens when computers try to divide by zero? Unless they've been explicitly told that they can't divide by zero, they naively give it a go. And the results can be terrifying." You can almost hear that in that slick documentary voice-over style, where everything spells doom: "Will the team find a way out, ... or will they fail?" And in this case (really, I picked a random page), the writer is wrong. There has been no "naively" dividing by zero for quite some time now. What happens is well defined, and in many languages requires explicit handling. There are more cases where the writer follows this loose, "journalistic" style, almost as if he expects the reader would lose interest without such casual segues. And that leads me to the next problem: most of the book is not about math errors. Instead, it's about not understanding or not properly modelling the subject matter (physics mostly), not measuring correctly, and not implementing properly. And quite a bit of text is dedicated to explaining probability calculus. Only a small part is about actual mathematical errors. So, if you want some entertaining reading with a technical streak, this can be your book, provided you've never read about the Challenger report, and don't know anything about collapsing bridges or programming errors that crash rockets. Otherwise, you might want to look for something else.

4out of 5Markus–"Humble Pi" is a good title. "A Comedy of Maths Errors" is not a good subtitle. The book is occasionally funny but too many people die during the stories for it to be a light read. The author mention problems in getting real world examples without turning to disasters, and it is noticeable. A good book but not what I was expecting.

5out of 5Ondrej Urban–This time it's a fuor-and-a-half stars, not that it will hurt Matt in any way. Humble Pi (love both the title and the cover design) talks about mathematical errors that happen or happened in the past. From MS Excel being too smart for its own good to programmers taking intended or unintended shortcuts that cause everything from annoyance to death, this book covers most of it. Unlike Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension, Matt's other book, this one will not make your head hurt and brain s This time it's a fuor-and-a-half stars, not that it will hurt Matt in any way. Humble Pi (love both the title and the cover design) talks about mathematical errors that happen or happened in the past. From MS Excel being too smart for its own good to programmers taking intended or unintended shortcuts that cause everything from annoyance to death, this book covers most of it. Unlike Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension, Matt's other book, this one will not make your head hurt and brain seep out of your skull through your ears if you read it too quickly - in that sense it's a very "popular" popular book. This might actually be a reason of my less-than-perfect score - once you've seen the abyss of the fun maths from the Fourth Dimension, reading about a mild annoyance of excel changing your enzyme names into dates is fun but the excitement is somewhat diminished. Maybe like ending a heroin bender with a glass of nice whisky - fun but somehwat of a different scale. This however also means that Humble Pi is a much easier book to recommend to your friends and relatives and stand a decent chance they'll enjoy it as well.

4out of 5Purnesh Tripathi–Humble Pi is a brilliant piece of writing which will make you laugh at least once on every page. Matt is a mathematician and you can easily tell that even if you don't have much background about him, by his style of writing. The book's 11th Chapter in particular was so breathtakingly gripping, that I finished it in one go. Even the other parts of the book read like an epic collection of short stories, each of which, combined with excellent writing skills, provide for am exhilerating experience. Di Humble Pi is a brilliant piece of writing which will make you laugh at least once on every page. Matt is a mathematician and you can easily tell that even if you don't have much background about him, by his style of writing. The book's 11th Chapter in particular was so breathtakingly gripping, that I finished it in one go. Even the other parts of the book read like an epic collection of short stories, each of which, combined with excellent writing skills, provide for am exhilerating experience. Disclaimer: I realized that I was often laughing like a madman while commuting in Auckland Metro, so if you spotted me at it, I apologize for the inconvenience. But seriously, this book is legit funny so beware, you would find yourself stupidly chuckling for no reason whatsoever, quite often.

5out of 5Ilia–It is an easy read which is quite hilarious. Despite the author is sometimes being too shallow on particular topics, I learned some new interesting facts and I can now definitely talk about bridges of all sorts.

4out of 5Tracey–Lots of interesting anecdotes. Sometimes the math and science explanations went over my head. Quite funny.

4out of 5E Lim–Entertaining read. The mix of stories, some humorous and some very tragic, raises awareness on common erroneous assumptions that leads to these errors.

5out of 5Bella H–Funny, thought-provoking and very interesting - a great book for anyone who is interested in engineering, physics, maths or programming.

5out of 5Elizabeth–Entertaining: A maths book that is fun to read. As anyone who knows me will be aware I love maths, but you don't need much maths to read this book. Everything is simply explained. Matt Parker shows why maths is important in the real world, by giving humorous examples of when it all went wrong.

4out of 5Simon–An interesting and sobering view... ... of the impact of mathematics in the world around us. From buildings to bridges and aircraft to rockets Matt shows how the maths is fundamentally important.

4out of 5Fiona–Books about numbers shouldn't be this fun or funny. I like Matt Parker's style, he makes maths not only interesting but accessible.

5out of 5Tim–I really enjoyed this, easy to read, engaging and amusing. As a Computer Science teacher I think I will be adding it to my recommended reading list.

5out of 5Finlay–Matt Parker is pretty good at turning maths into an accessible subject. I already read his other book (Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension) recently, and it turned out he narrated his own audiobook, so I tried that version this time. In some ways, I feel like I missed out on the diagrams from the book itself - maths can be very visual sometimes - but I gained a lot by Parker's lively narration. In fact, when he gets to parts of the book that are difficult to narrate (such as long string Matt Parker is pretty good at turning maths into an accessible subject. I already read his other book (Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension) recently, and it turned out he narrated his own audiobook, so I tried that version this time. In some ways, I feel like I missed out on the diagrams from the book itself - maths can be very visual sometimes - but I gained a lot by Parker's lively narration. In fact, when he gets to parts of the book that are difficult to narrate (such as long strings of numerals, or the aforementioned diagrams), he breaks from the narration and tries to describe it in a more conversational style. Most audiobooks I know would have just skipped over it, or read the incomprehensible numeral without much consideration for ease of understanding. Anyway, as a few others have noted, most of the errors that Parker talks about in the book are more about engineering or science than strictly mathematics, but let's not split hairs over that. More worryingly, it felt like about half of the errors concern planes that might drop out of the sky, or things like military and aerospace errors that are in the public domain. Not that I'm going to start being afraid of flying, but it makes you wonder how much we rely on these machines Not Breaking. The amount of times that Parker started describing a problem and I would realize before he got to the climax exactly what the problem would be - and then groan loudly out loud - is also worrying...

5out of 5Peter Jones–Another great read. I enjoy his presentation style and sense of humor. This one didn't stretch my math understanding like Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension did. But the anecdotal narrative provided a different and interesting take on presenting the mathematical concepts.

5out of 5Don McKenzie–Yes!! Very few maths or stats books leave me wanting to meet the authors. I now follow Matt Parker. An obvious love of all things mathematical coupled with a sense of humour Tom Sharpe would have appreciated make this book a joy.

5out of 5Mairead–Fab, just fab!

4out of 5Alden–Parker’s snarky humor and puerile puns make for a thoroughly entertaining read. And the way he went about crowdsourcing proofreading (“I’ve deliberately left three mistakes of my own in this book. Let me know if you catch them all!”) is fiendish. There are significantly more than three. But, “...all remaining errors are hilarious jokes I’ve demanded be left in.” These quotes are only here to show I’ve read the whole book. 0xFFFFUNNY stuff.

5out of 5Shawn Cooke–Books of popular mathematics can generally be divided into categories depending on how much prior knowledge the reader can be assumed to have. Matt Parker’s Humble Pi is accessible to pretty much anyone, but he manages to make it interesting reading for anyone from the novice up to the most well-informed armchair mathematician. He takes his theme of math(s) gone wrong and elaborates on it, pushing the concept into many directions. He does all of this with a clear purpose—illustrating not just how Books of popular mathematics can generally be divided into categories depending on how much prior knowledge the reader can be assumed to have. Matt Parker’s Humble Pi is accessible to pretty much anyone, but he manages to make it interesting reading for anyone from the novice up to the most well-informed armchair mathematician. He takes his theme of math(s) gone wrong and elaborates on it, pushing the concept into many directions. He does all of this with a clear purpose—illustrating not just how human nature can lead us astray from mathematical exactitude, but the important of learning from these failures in future. The subject matter might weight heavily in the hands of another author, but even when dealing with accidents which cost lives, Parker keeps the tone light. He does so without seeming to belittle the loss of life or those who made the mistakes that caused it — a balancing act that not everyone could have achieved. In short, if you have the slightest interest in math, science, or engineering, you could not do better than picking up a copy of Humble Pi. And I’ll be scanning the bookshelves for the next volume that Parker publishes, if he chooses to do so.

5out of 5Ben Orlin–A pleasantly overstuffed book documenting mathematical errors - large and small, frivolous and fatal, from across mathematics (not to mention engineering, architecture, and computer science). Such a catalogue might come off as pedantic or sneering, but Parker is too generous a writer (and too skilled a comedian) for that. He sympathizes with the mistaken even as he relishes the mistakes, whether it's the nail-biting tension of a (non-fatal) plane failure or the aggravating absurdity of a geometri A pleasantly overstuffed book documenting mathematical errors - large and small, frivolous and fatal, from across mathematics (not to mention engineering, architecture, and computer science). Such a catalogue might come off as pedantic or sneering, but Parker is too generous a writer (and too skilled a comedian) for that. He sympathizes with the mistaken even as he relishes the mistakes, whether it's the nail-biting tension of a (non-fatal) plane failure or the aggravating absurdity of a geometrically inaccurate soccer ball on U.K. road signs. What's the message? None, really; Parker is less interested in generalizations than in specific, compelling stories. As with a Randall Munroe or a Martin Gardner, the unifying force is the curiosity and personality of the writer. Also, a shout-out to the best gimmick I've seen in any pop math book: the pages are "mistakenly" numbered in reverse. (Disclaimer: I read an advanced reading copy provided by the author. But I assure you that my soul is iron, and his generosity did not sway me.)

5out of 5Tapio Kurkinen–Marvelous read. The book is filled with all types of mathematical errors made over the past decade and does a great job of analyzing why they happened and what can we learn from them. Parker's writing style is funny and easy to read and I really enjoyed the book from start to finish. I really struggled to decide if this deserved 5 stars but I ultimately decided to go with 4 for two reasons. Firstly I think this book felt way more disjoint than Parker's previous work and I think it could have focu Marvelous read. The book is filled with all types of mathematical errors made over the past decade and does a great job of analyzing why they happened and what can we learn from them. Parker's writing style is funny and easy to read and I really enjoyed the book from start to finish. I really struggled to decide if this deserved 5 stars but I ultimately decided to go with 4 for two reasons. Firstly I think this book felt way more disjoint than Parker's previous work and I think it could have focused on math a bit more. All the engineering mistakes were interesting but didn't feel coercive in the context of the book. Secondly, I felt the book could have gone into the details a bit more. I know the book was directed towards the general population and I'm in the minority as a math major, but I felt Parker's first book had way more interesting detail and new maths for me to learn. With all of this said, I still highly recommend this reading this book. My expectations were really high and I wasn't disappointed.

5out of 5St Fu–Making mistakes, especially when dealing with abstractions, is easy and common. In the software world, one saying is "There are no non-trivial programs without bugs." Another one goes "Testing can show the presence of bugs but never their absence." Most of us have heard of Murphy's law. I'm surprised that things tend to work as well as they do and at how confident we can be that we got things right. This book can be seen as a kind of sober celebration of this state of affairs along with some att Making mistakes, especially when dealing with abstractions, is easy and common. In the software world, one saying is "There are no non-trivial programs without bugs." Another one goes "Testing can show the presence of bugs but never their absence." Most of us have heard of Murphy's law. I'm surprised that things tend to work as well as they do and at how confident we can be that we got things right. This book can be seen as a kind of sober celebration of this state of affairs along with some attempts to theorize about how mistakes can better be prevented by looking at how they occurred. What's more, it's often funny. A personal note: There is one section that the author suggests you skip over if you happen to be on an airplane. I didn't do so even though I was waiting to board a plane to Amsterdam at the time. I reasoned that giving in to fear at this point could only make matters scarier. I (and the flight) were fine.

5out of 5Pınar–Another great read by Matt Parker. I love his sense of humor and his conversational style. Most of the errors were in engineering and computer programming, applications of which span various fields from finance to medicine. However, if you expect the "maths content" to resemble that of Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension, you may be disappointed. My sole expectation (maths-wise) was (view spoiler)[the mention of the fabulous Parker Square (hide spoiler)] and I was not disappointed. I ap Another great read by Matt Parker. I love his sense of humor and his conversational style. Most of the errors were in engineering and computer programming, applications of which span various fields from finance to medicine. However, if you expect the "maths content" to resemble that of Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension, you may be disappointed. My sole expectation (maths-wise) was (view spoiler)[the mention of the fabulous Parker Square (hide spoiler)] and I was not disappointed. I appreciate that he has managed to come up with a diverse bunch of real errors, because as it is also stated in the book, such errors are usually swept under the rug, or locked away behind non-disclosure agreements. I also appreciate the mention of functional sausages and hot cheese.

5out of 5Niels Philbert–I've enjoyed Matt Parkers way of looking at math in some videos, I am a sucker for puns and I am drawn to all things counter intuitive. So when I saw the title, author and cover, I was intrigued. If you are really into "math fun", I could imagine this book to actually be a bit dull. I'm not, so I found the book a wee bit too nerdy. And that might be where it loses the fourth star. It's not dumbed down enough to be broadly appealing, and not nerdy enough (I imagine) to engage the math lovers out t I've enjoyed Matt Parkers way of looking at math in some videos, I am a sucker for puns and I am drawn to all things counter intuitive. So when I saw the title, author and cover, I was intrigued. If you are really into "math fun", I could imagine this book to actually be a bit dull. I'm not, so I found the book a wee bit too nerdy. And that might be where it loses the fourth star. It's not dumbed down enough to be broadly appealing, and not nerdy enough (I imagine) to engage the math lovers out there. It might just be a bit too long. I enjoyed some parts and learned things (e.g. the well known misunderstanding related to a rise in heart attacks and Daylight Savings Time (it's more of an statistical fluke than a real thing)). All in all good, but it just couldn't keep up the pace. Will read the next book Matt writes - especially if he keeps it a bit shorter.

5out of 5Ravenous–This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. It’s a sad state of the world that it often seems socially acceptable to be “bad at math” or to “hate math”. I am the first to admit that I have said this myself but Matt Parker is changing my mind one video and book at a time! I never thought I would read much less LOVE a math book but here you are! Matt Parker’s humourous approach and indefatigable passion for math kept me reading and loving and sharing tidbits with anyone I met.... As for the three mistakes.... I think they might be: The airp It’s a sad state of the world that it often seems socially acceptable to be “bad at math” or to “hate math”. I am the first to admit that I have said this myself but Matt Parker is changing my mind one video and book at a time! I never thought I would read much less LOVE a math book but here you are! Matt Parker’s humourous approach and indefatigable passion for math kept me reading and loving and sharing tidbits with anyone I met.... As for the three mistakes.... I think they might be: The airplane wings on the cover, The page numbers And the spelling of Bradley vs Brady But I could be wrong :)

4out of 5J. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯–Oh yeah, speak nerdy to me... I was expecting something in the same vein as What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions, but where that book is more geek, this one is more nerd. A few sections got a bit dry, but the overall book was very enjoyable and evoked a couple of out loud chuckles. The author did a great job with the narration (which is a rare feat)

5out of 5Mario Cortes–An excellent exploration of so many different ways the numbers and math that permeate our lives can go wrong. For those that follow Matt Parker around the internets, some of the anecdotes within this book will be retreads from his other works, but that never kept me from laughing along with the absurdities and oddities. I’ve already found myself passing excerpts around with friends because somehow we’ve found ourselves discussing spreadsheet (bad) habits and rounding. Highly recommend to fans of Ma An excellent exploration of so many different ways the numbers and math that permeate our lives can go wrong. For those that follow Matt Parker around the internets, some of the anecdotes within this book will be retreads from his other works, but that never kept me from laughing along with the absurdities and oddities. I’ve already found myself passing excerpts around with friends because somehow we’ve found ourselves discussing spreadsheet (bad) habits and rounding. Highly recommend to fans of Matt Parker, to people who like math, or to people just looking for a (very nerdy) laugh.

4out of 5Marco Hokke–Entertaining stuff! Some of the errors that Parker has uncovered are gorgeously stupid. Some are a bit disturbing too. A lovely read, but also little more than a collection of remarkable mistakes in (mostly) construction and design. Sometimes Parkes goes a bit further and uncovers the mechanisms that have lead to mistakes (mostly rockets), but it would have been nice if there was more of a retrospective in some cases. That bridge, for example...